We didn’t start selling AI search optimization because it sounded like a trend worth capitalizing on.

We started because we ran an audit on ourselves, didn’t like what we found, and spent three months fixing it. Then we started doing the same thing for clients. This is the story of what we found, what we built, and what changed — and what the same process looks like when we run it for your business.

— The Honest Version

We ran an audit on ourselves. We didn’t like what we found.

— 01

What we found when we audited ourselves

In 2025, we sat down and did what we now do for every new client: we queried the major AI tools with the exact questions a potential client might ask. Questions like: “What’s the best strategic growth agency for small businesses?” “Who does SEO and AI search optimization for local businesses?” “What agencies specialize in LLM visibility and generative engine optimization?” “Who can help me get found on ChatGPT?”

The results were humbling. Despite being in business since 2010, with a fully optimized site, strong search visibility, and years of content — we were barely showing up in AI-generated answers. One tool named us in a generic list of agencies. Most gave advice without naming anyone. A couple recommended competitors.

We knew why. Our website was built to rank on Google, not to be understood by AI. Our content was keyword-optimized but not structured for machine readability. We had no llms.txt file. Our FAQ content was buried and unformatted. Our schema markup was minimal. We hadn’t given AI tools a clear reason to trust us as the authoritative answer.

So we got to work.

— 02

What we built — step by step

Five changes. Three months. Here’s exactly what we did.

Step 1: llms.txt file

The first thing we did was create and publish an llms.txt file at growwithlgx.com/llms.txt. We structured it to answer the specific questions a potential client might ask an AI tool: what we specialize in, what industries we serve, what results we’ve produced, what our approach is, and where to find our most important content. The file has to be specific and declarative — not marketing language, but plain-language descriptions that an AI model can parse with confidence.

Step 2: FAQ architecture rebuild

AI tools cite FAQ content more than almost any other content type. Our existing FAQ section was thin and generic. We rebuilt it from scratch — identifying the actual questions our target clients ask when researching agencies, writing clear and specific answers, and formatting everything with FAQPage schema markup so AI tools could identify and cite it accurately. We added questions across several categories: how retainers work, what SEO actually does, how AI search optimization differs from traditional SEO, what industries we serve, and how our pricing compares.

Step 3: Schema markup expansion

Schema markup is code that tells AI tools and search engines exactly what type of content they’re looking at. We expanded ours to include Organization and LocalBusiness schema with complete location, contact, and service information; Service schema on each of our six service category pages; FAQPage schema on all FAQ content; Article schema on blog posts; and PriceSpecification schema on our packages page. This gives AI tools a machine-readable map of who we are, what we do, and why we’re a credible source — without requiring them to interpret paragraphs of marketing copy.

Step 4: On-page content restructuring

We went through our key service pages and homepage and restructured the content to be more semantically clear — plain language that answers specific questions, organized hierarchically, with natural-language summaries at the top of each section. We also built entity references into our content: consistent, factual mentions of our business name, service categories, founding year, team structure, and areas of expertise across multiple pages. AI models build understanding through consistency — the more specifically you describe yourself across your site, the more confidently an AI can cite you.

Step 5: Before-and-after AI discovery audit

Before we started, we documented our baseline: what came up when we queried major AI tools with relevant questions. We screenshotted the results, noted which competitors appeared, and documented the specific gaps in how we were represented. We ran the same audit 60 days after implementation. The difference was substantial. LGX now appears in AI-generated answers for relevant queries about growth agencies and marketing services — with accurate, specific descriptions that match what we actually do.

— 60 Days Later

We ran the same audit 60 days later. The difference was substantial.

— 03

What the same process looks like for a client

When we run this process for a client, the sequence follows the same logic — adapted to their industry, their service area, and the specific questions their customers are asking AI tools.

The audit comes first

We sit down with real AI tools and query them the way a buyer in your market would. What comes up? Who gets recommended? Are you in the answer at all? If you are, how accurate is the representation? This gives us a baseline — and it’s usually enough to make the value of the work immediately clear.

The llms.txt file gets built on day one

For every new retainer client, it’s one of the first deliverables. Published to the site root, structured around your specific services and geography, and updated as your offerings or service areas change.

FAQ and AEO content is built in parallel

For local track clients — home services, medical, legal, contractors — we prioritize geo-specific FAQ content: “Who does [service] in [city]?” “What should I expect to pay for [service]?” For authority track clients — professional services, tech, SaaS — we prioritize expertise-driven content that answers the questions someone would ask an AI before deciding which provider to trust with a complex problem.

Schema markup is implemented systematically

Every new page we build for a client gets appropriate schema markup from day one. For existing sites, we audit what’s in place and expand it — especially FAQPage and Service schema, which have the most direct impact on AI citation.

The before-and-after audit closes the loop

We document what changed — not just what we built, but whether you now appear in AI-generated answers, how you appear, and what questions are still unanswered by your content.

Free AI Discovery Audit

Find out exactly what AI tools say about your business right now.

We run the same audit we ran on ourselves — querying ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude with the questions your customers actually ask. Takes 30 minutes. No commitment.

— 04

How to know if you need this

Short answer: if your business has a website and serves customers, you probably do.

The longer answer: ask yourself whether your potential customers are the type of people who might ask an AI tool a question before making a buying decision. If you serve homeowners, business owners, professionals, or anyone already using ChatGPT or Google’s AI Overviews — they are asking AI tools about businesses like yours. Whether your business is in that answer is a different question.

You can test this yourself right now. Open ChatGPT or Perplexity and type: “Who are the best [your service] businesses in [your city]?” or “What [your business type] would you recommend near [your market]?” Document what comes up. Note whether your name appears — and if it does, whether the description is accurate.

If you’re not in the answer — or if the answer is wrong — that’s what we fix. And the free audit we run is exactly this process, done systematically, across multiple AI tools, with the specific questions your customers are actually asking.

— The Test

Open ChatGPT. Ask who does what you do in your market. See if your name comes up.

— 05

The honest answer on timeline

We took three months to get the LGX result we were satisfied with. That’s not the standard client timeline — that’s what happens when you’re building the methodology from scratch while running a business at the same time.

For clients, the core implementation work — llms.txt, FAQ architecture, schema markup, on-page restructuring — typically takes two to four weeks depending on the size of the site. AI tools vary in how frequently they re-index content, but most clients begin to see improved AI representation within 60 to 90 days of completing the core work.

For retainer clients, it compounds. Every new page we build comes with appropriate schema markup. Every FAQ we add is another potential citation point. Every content update is another opportunity to give AI tools a clearer, more specific picture of your business. The clients who will have the strongest AI presence in 12 months are the ones who start now and keep building.

We document the before-and-after with every engagement. You’ll know exactly what changed — not just what we built, but whether you’re now showing up in the answers your customers are getting. That’s the only metric that matters.

Take the next step

Free AI Discovery Audit

We’ll run the same audit we ran on LGX — querying the major AI platforms with the questions your customers ask, showing you exactly what’s coming up, and telling you what it would take to change it. 30 minutes. No commitment.

— Common Questions

Questions about AI search visibility

LGX ran an AI discovery audit on itself in late 2024, identified five key gaps, and spent three months implementing fixes: publishing an llms.txt file, rebuilding FAQ architecture with FAQPage schema markup, expanding schema markup across all service pages, restructuring on-page content for semantic clarity and entity consistency, and running a before-and-after audit to document the change. The result was measurable — LGX now appears in AI-generated answers for relevant queries about growth agencies and marketing services.
An AI discovery audit is a systematic test of how a business appears across major AI tools — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude — using the specific questions real customers ask. The audit documents whether the business appears in AI-generated answers, how it’s described when it does appear, which competitors are being recommended instead, and what content gaps are preventing accurate or complete AI representation. LGX runs AI discovery audits as the first step for every client engagement, and offers a free audit for businesses who want to know where they stand.
Core implementation work — llms.txt creation, FAQ architecture, schema markup, and on-page restructuring — typically takes two to four weeks. Most clients begin to see improved AI representation within 60 to 90 days of completing the core work, as AI tools re-index content at varying speeds. For retainer clients, AI visibility compounds over time as new content, FAQ entries, and schema markup are added continuously.
LGX’s process for clients follows the same five-step sequence used on its own site: an AI discovery audit to establish a baseline, llms.txt creation and publication on day one, FAQ and AEO content built in parallel (geo-specific for local businesses, expertise-driven for authority-track clients), systematic schema markup implementation on all pages, and a before-and-after audit to document what changed.
You can test it yourself right now: open ChatGPT or Perplexity and ask who does what you do in your market. If your business doesn’t appear — or appears with inaccurate information — that’s a clear signal. Any business serving customers who use AI tools to find services has something to gain. LGX offers a free AI discovery audit that runs this test systematically across multiple AI tools with the specific questions your customers actually ask. There’s no commitment attached.